When considering an application for a restricted discretionary activity for a proposal listed below, the council will consider the whether the proposal meets the criteria listed.
1. Providing more than the maximum permitted number of car parking spaces:
a. The additional land used for car parking will not undermine efficient use of land and planned intensification in and around the city centre, metropolitan, town and local centres, and within mixed use corridors.
b. The unique nature and/or operation of the proposed activities on the site requires additional car parking spaces.
c. The vehicle movements associated with the additional car parking spaces will not have an adverse effect on the safe and efficient operation of the adjacent transport network, including public transport and the movements of pedestrians, cyclists and general traffic. This includes considering the effect of additional car parking on trip generation from the site during peak commuter times.
d. There is insufficient alternative car parking in the surrounding area, including on street and public car parking, to provide the additional car parking sought for the proposal.
e. There is a lack of access to the frequent public transport network, because the site is not within walking distance of a stop or station on the frequent public transport network. Walking distance is generally considered to be 1km for a stop on the rapid transit network and 800m for other stops on the frequent public transport network. However, walking distance will vary depending on the slope, terrain, attractiveness of the pedestrian network, and the type of pedestrian
f. the applicant has demonstrated that it is not practicable to provide the additional car parking by entering into a shared car parking arrangement with another site or sites in the immediate vicinity
g. the applicant has demonstrated that the demand for the additional car parking cannot be adequately addressed by management of existing or permitted car parking. Depending on number of additional car parking spaces proposed, the number of employees, and the location of the site, this may need to be supported by a detailed travel plan outlining measures and commitments for the activity or activities on-site will minimise the need for private vehicle use and make efficient use of any car parking provided
h. the proposal is consistent with the recommendations of any Comprehensive Parking Management Plan or any other car parking plan prepared or adopted by Auckland Transport for the centre or area.
2. Providing fewer than the required minimum number of car parking spaces
a. The amount of car parking proposed is sufficient for the proposal due to:
i. the nature of the operation or the availability and accessibility of public transport
ii. the measures and commitments outlined in a detailed travel plan for the site which will reduce the need for vehicle use to a level where car parking demands can be satisfactorily addressed through efficient use of the proposed car parking.
b. The reduction in car parking will not result in adverse effects from car parking overspill on adjacent activities and the safe and efficient operation of the adjoining transport network.
c. There is public car parking on-street or off-street in the immediate vicinity with capacity and availability at the times required to serve the proposal. The council must have a reasonable expectation that the car parking will continue to be available to provide for the proposal.
d. Whether the car parking requirements of the proposal will be met by entering into a shared car parking arrangement with another site in the immediate vicinity that has available car parking spaces which are not required at the same time as the proposed activity. For example, the proposed activity operates outside of normal business hours and the activity on the other site only operates during normal business hours. In such a situation, the council will require a legal agreement between the applicant and owner and occupiers of the site confirming the arrangement.
3. Infringing the development controls for cycle parking and end-of-trip facilities
a. Sufficient provision is made for cyclists and active modes and changes in demand for such facilities can be accommodated if the operation or use changes over time, having regard to:
i. the nature of the operation and the likely demand for long and short-term cycle parking and end-of-trip facilities
ii. the availability of adequate public cycle parking for short-stay use in the vicinity. The council must have a reasonable expectation that the public cycle parking will continue to be available.
b. The provision made for cyclists and active modes is practicable and adequate given site limitations and layout, arrangement of buildings and activities, users and operational requirements.
4. Providing fewer than the required number of loading spaces
a. The loading arrangements proposed for the site will not adversely affect the safe and efficient operation of adjacent transport network, including public transport and pedestrian, cycle and general traffic movements.
b. The specific business practice, operation or type of customer associated with the proposed activities mean that the site will not need the standard number of loading spaces.
c. An accessible and adequate on-street loading space is available nearby or can be created while having regard to other demands for kerbside use of the road. The council must have a reasonable expectation that the loading space will continue to be available to provide for the proposal.
d. Loading can be provided on another site in the immediate vicinity that has available spaces which are not required at the same time as the proposed activity. In such a situation, the council will require a legal agreement between the applicant and the owner and occupiers of the other site confirming the arrangement.
5. Infringing the development controls for design of car parking and loading areas or access
a. The modification will not have an adverse effect on the safe and efficient operation of the adjacent transport network, including public transport, pedestrians, cyclists and general traffic, having regard to:
i. the effect of the modification on visibility and safe sight distances particularly the extent to which vehicles entering/exiting the site can see, and be seen by, pedestrians, cyclists and other vehicles on the footpath and road carriageway:
ii. existing and future traffic conditions including speed, volume, type, current accident rate and the need for safe manoeuvring in all weathers
iii. existing pedestrian numbers, and estimated future pedestrian numbers having regard to the level of development provided for in the Unitary Plan
iv. existing community or public infrastructure located in the adjoining road, such as bus stops, bus lanes and cycleways.
b. The modification will not have an adverse effect on pedestrian amenity or the amenity of the streetscape, having regard to:
i. the effect of additional crossings or crossings which exceed the maximum width
ii. giving priority to pedestrian amenity and the continuity of activities and pedestrian movement at street level in the city centre, metropolitan, town and local centre zones.
c. The modification results in car parking, loading and access arrangements which are practicable and adequate having regard to:
i. site limitations and layout, and configuration of buildings and activities, users and operational requirements.
ii. the ability of the access to accommodate the nature and volume of traffic and vehicle types expected to use the access. This may include considering whether a wider vehicle crossing is required to comply with the tracking curve applicable to the largest site anticipated to use the site regularly
iii. the desirability of separating truck movements accessing a site from customer vehicle movements
iv. whether reduced manoeuvring and car parking space dimensions can be accommodated because the car parking will be used by regular users familiar with the layout, rather than by casual users.
d. Any use of mechanical car parking installation such as car stackers or turntables does not result in queuing beyond the site boundary.
e. Any stacked car parking where access is through another car parking space and does not comply with the development controls, is:
i. for vehicles being serviced at a vehicle repair premises; or
ii. within residential development where stacked car parking spaces are held in common ownership, under a single title, and cannot be offered or allocated as individual car parking spaces; or
iii. for regular users such as staff, and are clearly marked, defined and separated from other car parking; and
iv. located so it does not compromise the operation of the remainder of the car parking area.
6. Access within a vehicle access restriction
This applies to activities or development with access within part of a site with a Vehicle Access Restriction identified in 4.2.1.2.3.3.1, other than Vehicle Access Restriction adjacent to a road/rail level crossing.
a. The location and design of the access will not have an adverse effect on the safe and efficient operation of the adjacent transport network, including public transport, pedestrians, cyclists and general traffic, having regard to:
i. visibility and safe sight distances particularly the extent to which vehicles entering/exiting the site can see, and be seen by, pedestrians, cyclists and other vehicles on the footpath and road carriageway
ii. existing and future traffic conditions including speed, volume, type, current accident rate, and the need for safe manoeuvring in all weathers
iii. existing pedestrian numbers, and estimated future pedestrian numbers having regard to the level of development provided for in the Unitary Plan
iv. existing community or public infrastructure located in the adjoining road, such as bus stops, bus lanes and cycleways.
b. The access will not have an adverse effect on pedestrian or streetscape amenity. This includes giving priority to pedestrian amenity and the continuity of activities and pedestrian movement at street level in the city centre, metropolitan, town and local centre zones.
c. The access arrangements are practicable and adequate having regard to site limitations and layout, and arrangement of buildings and activities, users and operational requirements, having regard to:
i. whether the site can reasonably served by different access arrangements including:
- access from another road
-
shared or amalgamated access with another site or sites
-
via a frontage road, such as a slip lane or service road
ii. whether the need for access can reasonably be avoided by entering into a shared car parking and/or loading arrangement with another site or sites in the immediate vicinity.
d. for any proposed access within a Vehicle Access Restriction - Motorway Interchange Control, the intensity, scale and traffic generating nature of the proposal is such that it avoids, remedies or mitigates any adverse effect on the safe and efficient operation of the motorway interchange.
7. Access within a Vehicle Access Restriction - adjacent to a road/rail level crossing
a. The access will not have an adverse effect on the safe and efficient operation of the adjacent transport network, particularly the road/rail crossing.
b. The access arrangements are practicable and adequate having regard to site limitations and layout, and arrangement of buildings and activities, users and operational requirements.
8. Buildings or structures within a sightline area applying to a level crossing with sightline controls
a. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the safety of the level crossing for vehicles and pedestrians.
b. The proposal will not adversely affect visibility and safe sight distances particularly to the extent vehicles entering/exiting the level crossing can see trains.
Assessment criteria for park-and-ride
When considering an application for a restricted discretionary activity for a park-and-ride, the council will consider whether the proposal meets the criteria listed.
9. Effect on the transport network
a. Any proposal for a park-and-ride will be located and designed to support the public transport system by:
i. locating in close proximity to public transport stations, stops and terminals
ii. growing public transport patronage, especially in to assist in relieving congested corridors by encouraging commuters to shift to public transport for their travel
iii. making public transport easier and more convenient to use, thereby attracting new users
iv. improving the operational efficiency of the public transport system, particularly the frequent public transport network
v. extending the catchment for public transport into areas of low demand where it is not cost-effective to provide traditional services or feeders
vi. reinforcing existing and future investments on the frequent public transport network
vii. giving effect to any park-and-ride strategy adopted by Auckland Transport.
viii. providing free, secure and covering parking for cycles.
10. The scale, design, management and operation of the park-and-ride and its access points will not have an adverse effect on the safe and efficient operation of the transport network, including:
i. the safety of pedestrians and cyclists
ii. amenity for pedestrians
iii. avoiding queuing onto the road and conflict at access points to the facility
iv. avoiding generating high volumes of traffic onto local roads or areas with high pedestrian amenity
v. the operation of public transport services and related infrastructure.
11. Location, design and external appearance
The location, design and external appearance of the park-and-ride:
a. complements adjacent uses and developments with any buildings or structures to be of similar or compatible scale to those existing or provided for in the surrounding area
b. meets the design outcomes identified in this Unitary Plan for the site and / or location generally
c. provides screening for the upper levels of any car parking building, such as exterior panelling
d. is accessible, safe and secure for users with safe and attractive pedestrian connections within the facility and to adjacent public footpaths. This includes considering compliance with CPTED principles
e. provides an attractive interface between any buildings, structures or at-grade car parking areas and adjacent streets. Depending on location and scale, this may include:
i. maintaining an active frontage through sleeving and / or an interesting appearance through use of architectural treatments so that the facility contributes positively to the pedestrian amenity and to any retail, commercial or residential uses along the road it fronts.
ii. planting and other landscaping
f. provides for any buildings to be adapted for other uses if no longer required for car parking. In particular, the floor to ceiling height of a car parking building at street level should be capable of conversion to other activities provided for in the zone.
12. Compatibility with surrounding activities
The park-and-ride is compatible with surrounding activities with particular regard to residential uses. This includes ensuring that the design and operation meets any cross-region rules for managing light spill and/or noise.